Advanced search

Forums : General Topics : Requirements
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile [B^S] Acmefrog
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 175
Credit: 446,074
RAC: 0
Message 133 - Posted: 11 Jun 2007, 22:38:18 UTC

What are the requirements to run this project? I see what applications / OS are supported. Actually I am wondering what are the RAM requirements? Is this listed somewhere I overlooked?
ID: 133 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Scott
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 07
Posts: 662
Credit: 13,742
RAC: 0
Message 136 - Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 2:36:33 UTC - in response to Message 133.  

What are the requirements to run this project? I see what applications / OS are supported. Actually I am wondering what are the RAM requirements? Is this listed somewhere I overlooked?

I don't think we really have any minimum requirements, per se. I should think you could get by with 512 Mb (that's what my laptop has, as evidenced by it's taking over two hours without finishing one run of the longer WUs).
Scott Kruger
Project Administrator, Cosmology@Home
ID: 136 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
John McLeod VII
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 28
Credit: 456,098
RAC: 767
Message 137 - Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 2:38:04 UTC - in response to Message 136.  

What are the requirements to run this project? I see what applications / OS are supported. Actually I am wondering what are the RAM requirements? Is this listed somewhere I overlooked?

I don't think we really have any minimum requirements, per se. I should think you could get by with 512 Mb (that's what my laptop has, as evidenced by it's taking over two hours without finishing one run of the longer WUs).

I am going to give a 200Mhz Dual with 128 MB RAM a try.


BOINC WIKI
ID: 137 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Scott
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 07
Posts: 662
Credit: 13,742
RAC: 0
Message 139 - Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 2:48:21 UTC - in response to Message 137.  

What are the requirements to run this project? I see what applications / OS are supported. Actually I am wondering what are the RAM requirements? Is this listed somewhere I overlooked?

I don't think we really have any minimum requirements, per se. I should think you could get by with 512 Mb (that's what my laptop has, as evidenced by it's taking over two hours without finishing one run of the longer WUs).

I am going to give a 200Mhz Dual with 128 MB RAM a try.

Please, do tell us how it goes!
Scott Kruger
Project Administrator, Cosmology@Home
ID: 139 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
John McLeod VII
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 28
Credit: 456,098
RAC: 767
Message 142 - Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 3:57:25 UTC - in response to Message 139.  

What are the requirements to run this project? I see what applications / OS are supported. Actually I am wondering what are the RAM requirements? Is this listed somewhere I overlooked?

I don't think we really have any minimum requirements, per se. I should think you could get by with 512 Mb (that's what my laptop has, as evidenced by it's taking over two hours without finishing one run of the longer WUs).

I am going to give a 200Mhz Dual with 128 MB RAM a try.

Please, do tell us how it goes!

After I get some work.


BOINC WIKI
ID: 142 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [B^S] Acmefrog
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 175
Credit: 446,074
RAC: 0
Message 145 - Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 4:49:29 UTC

I've noticed that on my Athlon 2400 machine 1 gig RAM, the whole machine gets sluggish when running these WUs. But on my Intel dual core 1.6mhz and 1 gig RAM there is no sluggishness. Has anyone else experienced this?
ID: 145 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Misfit
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 07
Posts: 150
Credit: 237,789
RAC: 0
Message 163 - Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 23:29:22 UTC - in response to Message 145.  

Has anyone else experienced this?

Everyday before coffee.
me@rescam.org
ID: 163 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Stanley A Bourdon
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Jun 07
Posts: 11
Credit: 105,685
RAC: 0
Message 175 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 13:26:33 UTC

Hi

I have completed work units with a pII 366, win98, 384mb ram,

thank you
Stanley


Boinc Wikipedia - the FAQ in active change
ID: 175 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
John McLeod VII
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 28
Credit: 456,098
RAC: 767
Message 181 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 18:31:16 UTC

I went and looked. I have completed work with a Pentium 200MHz Dual with 128MB RAM.


BOINC WIKI
ID: 181 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [AF>Futura Sciences>Linux] Thrr-Gilag
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 May 07
Posts: 32
Credit: 145,576
RAC: 0
Message 197 - Posted: 14 Jun 2007, 11:07:31 UTC

I have complete correctly some WU early in the test with my pentium II (a linux server)

http://cosmos.astro.uiuc.edu/cosmohome/show_host_detail.php?hostid=66

So I thinck the minimum requirement to be very low
------
Thrr-Gilag Kee'rr

L'Alliance Francophone
ID: 197 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [B^S] Acmefrog
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 175
Credit: 446,074
RAC: 0
Message 213 - Posted: 15 Jun 2007, 1:59:43 UTC - in response to Message 145.  

I've noticed that on my Athlon 2400 machine 1 gig RAM, the whole machine gets sluggish when running these WUs. But on my Intel dual core 1.6mhz and 1 gig RAM there is no sluggishness. Has anyone else experienced this?


I still have this issue with my AMD machine. Every time I load a program it takes forever. Even while I am on-line the pages load very slowly (kinda like I am back on dial-up). But I am starting to think it has to do with the various anti-virus and anti-spyware programs I run. Some of these programs are not on my other computer. On this machine I run the following:

Zone Alarm
Norton AV
SpywareBlaster
Spybot
Pest Patrol
Ad-aware
Trend Micro Anti-spyware

(not all are always running but many do)

None of the other projects have slowed this machine as much except for NanoHive, which I believed to be too intensive for the old machine. Does anyone know if Cosmology's codes and processes would trigger one of these programs to go crazy? I will try running cosmo with various programs running to see if I can find which it might be.
ID: 213 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Misfit
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 07
Posts: 150
Credit: 237,789
RAC: 0
Message 233 - Posted: 16 Jun 2007, 4:30:52 UTC - in response to Message 213.  

While nanohive caused some havoc on my machine I haven't noticed the slightest hesitation with cosmo.

On the extreme end of the havoc scale is scilink.
me@rescam.org
ID: 233 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [B^S] Dr. Bill Skiba
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Jun 07
Posts: 6
Credit: 482,678
RAC: 0
Message 237 - Posted: 18 Jun 2007, 3:06:05 UTC

Quite some time ago I found a problem running 2 antivirus programs simultaneously. Dropping one seemed to solve it. I have two xp2500 boxes with Symantec AV, spybot, ad-aware, and spyware blaster on board and don't seem to have any issues with slow downs.
ID: 237 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [B^S] Acmefrog
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 175
Credit: 446,074
RAC: 0
Message 465 - Posted: 27 Jun 2007, 6:15:32 UTC

A few days ago I had to reboot my pc. I also stopped the Trendmicro on it. Now it isn't slow. Maybe the Trendmicro just doesn't like the way Cosmo works. I'll experiment more later with it back on.
ID: 465 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Bryan Siegfried
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jul 07
Posts: 26
Credit: 3,740,940
RAC: 0
Message 1089 - Posted: 16 Jul 2007, 23:09:03 UTC - in response to Message 465.  

A few days ago I had to reboot my pc. I also stopped the Trendmicro on it. Now it isn't slow. Maybe the Trendmicro just doesn't like the way Cosmo works. I'll experiment more later with it back on.



Maybe its time for Linux?

Bryan =)
ID: 1089 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Forums : General Topics : Requirements