Forums :
General Topics :
New 4.5 Cr/WU results
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 ohiomike Send message Joined: 17 Jul 07 Posts: 302 Credit: 5,006,319 RAC: 0 |
First look at the new WU's I've gotten (rough calculations): ============================================================================= VS running projects: Windows XP x64, 3.4GHz P4-D, 71% of SETI optimized Cr/Hr Windows XP i686, 3.4GHz P4, 64% of SETI optimized Cr/Hr Linux x64, 2.6 GHz 5600+ x2, 109% of QMC Cr/Hr Linux i686, 3.0 GHz P4, 64% of SETI optimized Cr/Hr *Note the SETI comparisons are against optimized SSE3 applications, the Cr/Hr would probably be about 85-95% vs the stock app. ============================================================================= VS BoincView calculations (based on benchmark scores): Windows XP x64, 3.4GHz P4-D, 82% Cr/Hr Windows XP i686, 3.4GHz P4, 92% Cr/Hr Linux x64, 2.6 GHz 5600+ x2, 110% Cr/Hr Linux i686, 3.0 GHz P4, 101% Cr/Hr ============================================================================= Note- This is not a credit complaint, just info for anyone interested. The credits appear to be close to being in-line with the majority of projects I've looked at.   Boinc Button Abuser In Training >My Shrubbers< |
|
ohiomike Send message Joined: 17 Jul 07 Posts: 302 Credit: 5,006,319 RAC: 0 |
First look at the new WU's I've gotten (rough calculations): Edited to use average time & correct CPU speeds. Averaged 100+ WU's for time (1st post was base on time estimates): ============================================================================= VS running projects: Windows XP x64, 3.4GHz P4-D, 66% of SETI optimized Cr/Hr Windows XP i686, 3.3 GHz P4, 69% of SETI optimized Cr/Hr Linux x64, 2.8 GHz 5600+ x2, 117% of QMC Cr/Hr Linux i686, 3.0 GHz P4, 74% of SETI optimized Cr/Hr *Note the SETI comparisons are against optimized SSE3 applications, the Cr/Hr would probably be about 90-100% vs the stock app. ============================================================================= VS BoincView calculations (based on benchmark scores): Windows XP x64, 3.4GHz P4-D, 85% Cr/Hr Windows XP i686, 3.3 GHz P4, 100% Cr/Hr Linux x64, 2.8 GHz 5600+ x2, 118% Cr/Hr Linux i686, 3.0 GHz P4, 106% Cr/Hr ============================================================================= It looks like the credit being awarded by the new WU's is almost dead-on. (Although you can give us more if you want!) I'm not sure why the P4-D Windows machine reads low, maybe Windows x64 running the 32 bit app slows things down? Boinc Button Abuser In Training >My Shrubbers< |
