Advanced search

Forums : General Topics : Name of WUs
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Svenie25

Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 07
Posts: 68
Credit: 34,092
RAC: 0
Message 1184 - Posted: 20 Jul 2007, 8:01:48 UTC
Last modified: 20 Jul 2007, 8:04:22 UTC

I wanted to ask, if I am right, with my thinkings about the names of the WUs.
The first 4 numbers are the date (mmddyy), on wich they were created and then the other numbers are the time (hhmmss) of creation, or?
MfG
Sven S. aus G.
ID: 1184 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Mr.Pernod
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 07
Posts: 60
Credit: 841,431
RAC: 0
Message 1408 - Posted: 23 Jul 2007, 11:19:38 UTC
Last modified: 23 Jul 2007, 11:19:51 UTC

deducing from the recent case of faulty workunits I think this is the way they are made up:

wu_MMDDYY_HHMMSS_x

"wu_" => workunit
"MMDDYY_" => date of creation
"HHMMSS_" => time of creation in Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, local time
"x" => 0 or 1 => ?? sequence number ??
ID: 1408 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Scott
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 07
Posts: 662
Credit: 13,742
RAC: 0
Message 1425 - Posted: 23 Jul 2007, 14:45:34 UTC - in response to Message 1408.  

deducing from the recent case of faulty workunits I think this is the way they are made up:

wu_MMDDYY_HHMMSS_x

"wu_" => workunit
"MMDDYY_" => date of creation
"HHMMSS_" => time of creation in Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, local time
"x" => 0 or 1 => ?? sequence number ??

Yes. Sorry I didn't post here, but I posted this in another thread, actually.
Scott Kruger
Project Administrator, Cosmology@Home
ID: 1425 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Forums : General Topics : Name of WUs